Jammu and Kashmir High Court
SWP/1948/2014 of WAJADA TABASOM Vs STATE TH.EDUCATION DEPTT.AND ORS. on 3 September 2026
OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU SWP No. 1948/2014 Wajada Tabasom …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Abhirash Sharma, Advocate Vs State of J&K and others .…. Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Salika Sheikh, Advocate vice Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG Mr. Masood Ahmed,
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
SWP No. 1948/2014
Wajada Tabasom
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Abhirash Sharma, Advocate
Vs
State of J&K and others
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Salika Sheikh, Advocate vice Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG
Mr. Masood Ahmed, Advocate
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
03.09.2026
1. The instant petition, with the efflux of time and also in the light of the law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in its recent judgment passed in case titled “Union Territory of J&K and others Vs. Saba Wani” decided on 30.04.2026 has been rendered infructuous, as the petitioner is not figuring in the select panel and, therefore, no relief can be granted at this stage.
2. In view of the rider imposed by the Hon’ble Apex Court and keeping in view the nature of the reliefs sought in the instant petition, whereby the petitioner is seeking quashment of the final panel of RET Teacher prepared for M.S Margaimar, revenue village Qasba Poonch, and published vide notice dated 24.12.2013 with a direction to engage the petitioner from out of candidates belonging to the said habitations, the writ petition cannot be proceeded with, particularly as the petitioner is not figuring in the select panel. The reliefs sought in the instant petition, therefore, cannot be acceded to. Sr. No. 49
SWP No. 1948/2014
3. Accordingly, in view of the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court mentioned (supra) the writ petition is not maintainable and liable to be dismissed in the light of rider imposed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in case mentioned supra.
4. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge Jammu 03.09.2026 Rahul Sharma