Jammu and Kashmir High Court
SWP/2380/2014 of REETA DEVI Vs STATE TH.SOCIAL WELFARE DEPTT.AND ORS. on 3 September 2026
OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU SWP No. 2380/2014 c/w CPSW No. 736/2017 Reeta Devi …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: None Vs State of J&K and others .…. Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Salika Sheikh, Advocate vice Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG Coram: HON’BLE MR.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
SWP No. 2380/2014 c/w
CPSW No. 736/2017
Reeta Devi
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs
State of J&K and others
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Salika Sheikh, Advocate vice Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
03.09.2026
SWP No. 2380/2014
1. The record reveals that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on the last date of hearing and same is the position today as well. Thus, an inference can be drawn that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the instant petition.
2. The instant petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution.
3. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated. CPSW No. 736/2017
Since the main matter has been dismissed, the contempt petition arising out of the order/judgment passed by this Court in the instant matter does not survive. Accordingly, the proceedings in the instant contempt petition are also closed. Rule if any, shall stand discharged.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge Jammu 03.09.2026 Rahul Sharma
Sr. No. 52