Jammu and Kashmir High Court
OW104/87/2013 of MUNSHI SINGH AND ANR. Vs SWARAN SINGH on 1 September 2026
OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU OW104 No. 87/2013 c/w OW104 No. 32/2013 Munshi Singh and another …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: None Vs Swaran Singh .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Rakesh Sadotra, Advocate Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL,
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
OW104 No. 87/2013 c/w
OW104 No. 32/2013
Munshi Singh and another
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs
Swaran Singh
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Rakesh Sadotra, Advocate
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
01.09.2026
OW104 No. 87/2013
1. The record reveals that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners on the last two dates of hearing, i.e. 22.07.2026 and 09.03.2026, and same is the position today as well. Thus, an inference can be drawn that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the instant petition.
2. The instant petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution.
3. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated. OW104 No. 32/2013
1. The record reveals that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners on the last date of hearing, i.e. 29.04.2014, and same is the position today as well. Thus, an inference can be drawn that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the instant petition.
2. The instant petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution.
3. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge Jammu 01.09.2026 Rahul Sharma
Sr. No. 20