Jammu and Kashmir High Court

WP(Crl)/85/2026 of BAHADUR ALI Vs UNION OF INDIA TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO GOVT MINISTRY OF HOME AND OTHERS on 31 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Case:- WP(Crl) No. 85/2026 CM No. 5937/2026 Bahadur Ali …..Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Rupak Ratta, Advocate Ms. Syed Shehnaz Fatima, Advocate. Vs Union of India & Ors. .…. Respondent(s) Through: Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT JAMMU

Case:-

WP(Crl) No. 85/2026

CM No. 5937/2026

Bahadur Ali

…..Petitioner(s)

Through: Mr. Rupak Ratta, Advocate

Ms. Syed Shehnaz Fatima, Advocate.

Vs

Union of India & Ors.

.…. Respondent(s)

Through:

Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

(31.08.2026)

1. The petitioner-Bahadur Ali S/o Beru, R/o village Mantalai, tehsil Chenani, district Udhampur identifies himself to have brought up in adoption one Mohd. Sharif S/o late Hukum Din, r/o Village Mantalai, tehsil Chenani, district Udhampur who reportedly died under suspicious circumstances on 13.05.2026 within the jurisdiction of the Police Station Jharkhand, Chattisgarh.

2. The petitioner is seeking indulgence of this Court to direct investigation to be concluded by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) with respect to suspicious death of said Mohd. Sharif.

3. Deceased- Mohd. Sharif was brought from Jharkhand to his native place in Mantalai, Udhampur where his dead body came to be subjected to burial by reference to which the petitioner submits that at the time of burial of the deal body of the deceased taking place, several injuries including multiple fractures of leg and Regular Cause List Serial No. 03

2 WP(Crl) No. 85/2026

arms and broken teeth were noticed wherefrom suspicion about foul play attending the death of said Mohd. Sharif is said to have been entertained by the petitioner. If that was the scenario, then the petitioner ought not to have allowed the burial of the dead body of the deceased-Mohd. Sharif without first notifying the Police of the Police Station Chenani, district Udhampur about this aspect attending dead body of the deceased Mohd. Sharif for enabling a requisite police action.

4. Without going into the veracity of the apprehension and assertion of the petitioner, this Court is of the view that given the fact that death of Mohd. Sharif had taken place within the territorial jurisdiction of the Police Station Jharkhand, State of Chattisgarh, as such, if any, indulgence is intended by the petitioner for investigation of the case related to death of Mohd. Sharif, then the same can be expected by the petitioner by soliciting the indulgence of the Hon’ble High Court of Chattisgarh and, therefore, this Court is having no jurisdiction to come forward with the direction of the nature, as solicited by the petitioner, as such, the petition is not entertained and hence dismissed.

(RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU

31.08.2026

Shivalee

Shivalee Khajuria 2026.09.01 14:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead