Jammu and Kashmir High Court

CRM(M)/898/2026 of SASHA SINGH Vs SUNEET VERMA AND OTHERS on 19 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CRM(M) No. 898/2026 CrlM No. 1623/2026 Sasha Singh, Age 36 years W/O Suneet Verma, R/O House No. 342, Sector 51 Orchid Island, Gurugram At present 47/5 Channi Himmat, Jammu. …..Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Ashish Sharma, Advocate Mr. Rudhar

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT JAMMU

CRM(M) No. 898/2026

CrlM No. 1623/2026

Sasha Singh, Age 36 years

W/O Suneet Verma,

R/O House No. 342, Sector 51

Orchid Island, Gurugram

At present 47/5 Channi Himmat, Jammu.

…..Petitioner(s)

Through: Mr. Ashish Sharma, Advocate

Mr. Rudhar Partap Singh, Advocate

Mr. Deepak Singh Baloria, Advocate.

Vs

1. Suneet Verma, S/O Sh. Suresh Chander

2. Suresh Chander, S/O not known

3. Anita Verma, W/O Sh. Suresh Chander

All resident of O-43; 2nd Floor; Sector 40; South City-1; Gurugram-122001

4. Puneet Verma S/O Suresh Chander

5. Priyanka Verma W/O Puneet Verma

Both residents of House No. 342

Orchid Island Sector 51 Gurugram.

.…. Respondent(s)

Through:

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M A CHOWDHARY, JUDGE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

(19.08.2026)

1. The petitioner, through the medium of the present petition, seeks a direction to the learned Judicial Magistrate (Munsiff), Jammu for complying with its own order dated 16.10.2023, whereby in an application filed under Section 12 of the Domestic Violence Act, 2012, vide order dated 16.10.2023, the petitioner was granted monthly maintenance of Rs. 5,000/-. It is alleged that the respondent No. 1 has paid only an amount of Rs. 25,000/- till date and that arrears of more than Rs. 4.00 lakhs are outstanding against him. Supp. Cause List-1 Serial No. 97

2 CRM(M) No. 898/2026

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would feel satisfied, if the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the learned court below to expedite the enforcement of the maintenance order in the execution petition filed by the petitioner.

3. The relief sought by the petitioner is innocuous in nature and essentially seeks enforcement of the order already passed by the learned trial court.

4. Viewed thus, the present petition is disposed of at this motion stage, with a direction to the learned court below to expedite the execution of the aforestated maintenance order in the execution petition filed by the petitioner for enforcement of the order regarding payment/recovery of maintenance, of course, in accordance with law.

5. Disposed of, accordingly, alongwith connected application(s).

(M A CHOWDHARY) JUDGE JAMMU

19.08.2026

Shivalee

Shivalee Khajuria 2026.08.19 18:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead