Jammu and Kashmir High Court
WP(C)/2519/2026 of MOHD RAFEEQ Vs UT OF J AND K TH. COMMISSIONER SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS on 19 August 2026
OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP (C) No. 2519/2026 CM No. 5475/2026 Mohd. Rafeeq …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Ch. Nayaz Ahmed Naz, Advocate Vs U.T. of J&K and others .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG with Ms. Saliqa Sheikh, Assisting
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
WP (C) No. 2519/2026
CM No. 5475/2026
Mohd. Rafeeq
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Ch. Nayaz Ahmed Naz, Advocate
Vs
U.T. of J&K and others
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG with
Ms. Saliqa Sheikh, Assisting Counsel
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
19.08.2026
1. After arguing for a while, when learned counsel for the petitioner was confronted with the maintainability of the instant petition by Mr. Raman Sharma, learned AAG appearing on behalf of the respondents, on the ground that the petitioner had already preferred a writ petition, registered as WP(C) No. 1893/2026, which came to be dismissed by a Coordinate Bench vide order/judgment dated 17.07.2026, and the petitioner has preferred the instant writ petition by twisting the grounds and making a false statement before the Court, which is not permissible in law. The act of the petitioner in filing the instant petition tantamount to playing fraud with the Court. The learned counsel, when confronted with the same, makes a statement that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant writ petition unconditionally. Sr. No. 173
2
WP (C) No. 2519/2026 CM No. 5475/2026
2. In the light of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the warning that the petitioner shall be careful in future as the act of the petitioner, in the instant case of filing the instant petition falls within the realm of abuse of the process of law.
3. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn, with a warning to the petitioner to be careful in future.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge Jammu 19.08.2026 Nikhil