Jammu and Kashmir High Court
CRM(M)/899/2026 of SASHA SINGH Vs SUNEET VERMA on 19 August 2026
OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CRM(M) No. 899/2026 CrlM No. 1624/2026 Sasha Singh, Age 36 years W/O Suneet Verma, R/O O-43; 2nd Floor; Sector 40; South City-1, Gurugram-122001 At present 47/5 Channi Himmat, Jammu. …..Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Ashish Sharma, Advocate Mr.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
CRM(M) No. 899/2026
CrlM No. 1624/2026
Sasha Singh, Age 36 years
W/O Suneet Verma,
R/O O-43; 2nd Floor; Sector 40;
South City-1, Gurugram-122001
At present 47/5 Channi Himmat, Jammu.
…..Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Ashish Sharma, Advocate
Mr. Rudhar Partap Singh, Advocate
Mr. Deepak Singh Baloria, Advocate.
Vs
Suneet Verma, S/O Sh. Suresh Chander
R/O O-43; 2nd Floor; Sector 40;
South City-1; Gurugram-122001.
.…. Respondent(s)
Through:
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M A CHOWDHARY, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
(19.08.2026)
1. The petitioner, through the medium of the present petition, seeks a direction to the learned Principal District Judge (Family Court), Jammu for effectively complying with its own order dated 18.02.2026 whereby in an application filed under Section 488 of the old J&K Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C) of 1898 which corresponds to Section 125 of the Central Cr.P.C, the petitioner was granted monthly maintenance of Rs. 15,000/- per month. It is alleged that the respondent has not paid a single penny out of Rs. 12,00,000/- which has been calculated as arrears.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would feel satisfied, if the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the learned trial Supp. Cause List-1 Serial No. 98
2 CRM(M) No. 899/2026
court to expedite the enforcement of the order in its execution petition filed by the petitioner.
3. The relief sought by the petitioner is innocuous in nature and essentially seeks enforcement of the order already passed by the learned trial court, regarding which execution petition is stated to be pending before the court below.
4. Viewed thus, the present petition is disposed of at this motion stage, with a direction to the learned court below to expedite the enforcement of the order in the execution petition filed by the petitioner for enforcement of the order regarding payment/recovery of maintenance, of course, in accordance with law.
5. Disposed of, accordingly, alongwith connected application(s).
(M A CHOWDHARY) JUDGE JAMMU
19.08.2026
Shivalee
Shivalee Khajuria 2026.08.19 18:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document