Jammu and Kashmir High Court
WP(C)/143/2024 of MANSA RAM Vs U T OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY PWD R AND B DEPTT AND OTHERS on 18 August 2026
OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 143/2024 CM No. 306/2024 Mansa Ram …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate vs UT of J&K and ors. .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG Mr. Vishal Gupta, Advocate vice Ms. Monika Kohli,
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 143/2024
CM No. 306/2024
Mansa Ram
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate
vs
UT of J&K and ors.
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG
Mr. Vishal Gupta, Advocate vice
Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG
Mr. Divyanshu Malhotra, Advocate vice
Mr. Suneel Malhotra, GA
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
18.08.2026
1. In terms of order dated 13.10.2025, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 1, 3 to 5 was directed to seek instructions, as to whether the respondents are still interested in executing the project at the relevant spot.
2. Mr. Ravinder Gupta, learned AAG has produced a copy of communication dated 16.08.2026, which is taken on record. Perusal of said communication reveals that the scheme has been closed and no work is presently under execution at the site under the said scheme.
3. In view of the above, no further directions are required to be issued, as such, the proceedings in the present petition are closed.
4. Disposed of.
(RAJNESH OSWAL)
JUDGE
Jammu 18.08.2026 Neha-II Serial No. 21 NEHA KUMARI 2026.08.19 10:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document