Jammu and Kashmir High Court
CPSW/15/2016 of YASEER HUSSAIN AND ORS. Vs R.K.GOYAL,SECY.HOME AND ANR. on 18 August 2026
OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CPSW No. 15/2016 Yaseer Hussain & Ors …..Petitioner(s) Through: None R K Goyal & Anr .…. Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Chetna Manhas, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL,
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
CPSW No. 15/2016
Yaseer Hussain & Ors
…..Petitioner(s)
Through: None
R K Goyal & Anr
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Chetna Manhas, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG
Coram:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
(18.08.2026)
01. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submits that the order/judgment passed by the learned Writ Court dated 21.04.2015 in SWP No. 1101/2015 stands complied with.
02. The learned counsel with a view to fortify her submission has provided a consideration order No. 2285 of 2016 dated 04.08.2016, a perusal whereof reveals that pursuant to the directions passed by the learned Writ Court, the claim of the petitioners for their appointment as Constables in J&K Executive Police was duly considered and upon consideration on merits, rejected as being devoid of any legal force/justification. A copy of the said order has been provided to this Court, which has been taken on record.
03. Since the order/judgment passed by the learned Writ Court was only to the extent of according consideration and deciding the representation filed by the petitioners by passing of appropriate consideration order which has been complied with by the respondents by issuance of aforesaid consideration order, thus no fruitful purpose would be served to keep the S. No. 39
2 CPSW No. 15/2016
instant contempt petition alive as the order/judgment passed by the learned writ Court stands complied with.
04. Accordingly, the proceedings in the instant contempt proceedings are closed. Rule, if any, shall stand discharged. The contempt petition is disposed of.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE JAMMU
18.08.2026
Vijay
Vijay Kumar 2026.08.19 03.03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Jammu