Jammu and Kashmir High Court
CCP(S)/67/2024 of M/S PALLAVI ASSOCIATE REPRESENTED BY PALLAVI SHARMA Vs BABITA RAKWAL SECRETARY TO GOVT COOPERATIVES DEPTT CIVIL SECTT JAMMU AND ANOTHER on 18 August 2026
OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Case: - CCP(S) No. 67/2024 c/w CCP(S) No. 546/2019 M/S Pallavi Associate …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Ankush Manhas, Advocate vs Babita Rakwal and Anr. .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Pawan Dev Singh, Dy.AG Coram:
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
Case: - CCP(S) No. 67/2024
c/w CCP(S) No. 546/2019
M/S Pallavi Associate
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Ankush Manhas, Advocate
vs
Babita Rakwal and Anr.
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Pawan Dev Singh, Dy.AG
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
18.08.2026
CCP(S) No. 67/2024
1. The writ petition preferred by the petitioner was disposed of in terms of order dated 18.06.2019, the operating part of the order is extracted as under:
“In view of the aforesaid submissions, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the legal notice
dated 24.05.2019 for release of the payment pending with them
within a period of four weeks from the date a certified copy of this
order is made available to the respondents by the petitioner.”
2. The respondents have filed their objections stating therein that examination of records available in erstwhile JAKFED, the liquidator had prepared and submitted a report on 04.02.2021 to the Government, thereby showing an amount of ₹12,04,537/- under the account head “Claims of Suppliers/Firms” (Tor Steel) as liability towards M/S Pallavi Associate. It is further stated that the respondents have never accepted the amount of ₹65.64/- lacs and they have already replied to the said notice of the petitioner. Serial No. 159
-2-
3. At this stage, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the respondents be directed to release ₹12,04,537/-. This Court is of the considered view that once there is no such direction in the order referred to above which is the subject matter of the present contempt petition, a direction as sought by learned counsel for the petitioner cannot be issued by this Court as the Court cannot travel beyond the order.
4. In view of the above, the proceedings in the present contempt petition are closed.
CCP(S) No. 546/2019
Learned counsel appearing for the respondents is directed to file compliance report before the next date of hearing.
List on 07.09.2026.
(RAJNESH OSWAL)
JUDGE
Jammu 18.08.2026 AKHILESH