Jammu and Kashmir High Court
SWP/9900006/2013 of SEEMA DEVI Vs STATE TH.EDU.DEPTT.AND ORS. on 18 August 2026
OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU SWP No. 9900006/2013 Seema Devi …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: None Vs State of J&K and others .…. Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Chetna Manhas, Advocate vice Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
SWP No. 9900006/2013
Seema Devi
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs
State of J&K and others
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Chetna Manhas, Advocate vice Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
18.08.2026
1. The instant petition, with the efflux of time and also in the light of the law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the recent judgment passed in case titled “Union Territory of J&K and Ors. Vs. Saba Wani” decided on 30.04.2026, has been rendered infructuous. The instant petition has come up before this Court after a period of thirteen years, and during this intervening period, and there has been no effort on the part of the petitioner to get the instant petition listed.
2. Today also, when the matter was taken up, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Thus, an inference can be drawn that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the instant petition and even otherwise also the petition has been rendered infructuous.
3. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
4. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge Jammu 18.08.2026 Nikhil
Sr. No. 35