Jammu and Kashmir High Court

CPSW/420/2016 of SURJEET SINGH AND ORS. Vs ASHOK KUMAR SHARMA DIR.SCHOOL EDU.JAMMU AND ORS. on 14 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CPSW No. 420/2016 in SWP No. 1947/2016 Surjeet Singh and others …. Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through:- Mr. K.L. Pandita, Advocate V/s Ashok Kumar Sharma and others …..Respondent(s) Through:- Mr. Jagmeet Kour, Advocate vice Mr. Raman

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT JAMMU

CPSW No. 420/2016 in

SWP No. 1947/2016

Surjeet Singh and others

…. Petitioner/Appellant(s)

Through:-

Mr. K.L. Pandita, Advocate

V/s

Ashok Kumar Sharma and others

…..Respondent(s)

Through:-

Mr. Jagmeet Kour, Advocate vice

Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG

CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

14.08.2026

1. The proceedings in this contempt petition have been initiated for non- compliance of judgment dated 16.09.2016, passed in SWP No. 1947/2016, vide which, the petition was disposed of with a direction to respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to consider the case of the petitioners for their regularization as General Line Teacher in light of the recommendation made by the Zonal Education Officers, Baljarallan/Doongi and in terms of Policy and Rules governing the field within a period of six weeks from the date a copy of this order is furnished to the respondents by the petitioners.

2. Compliance report in terms of order dated 12.12.2025 has been filed. In terms of compliance report, it is submitted that the case of the petitioner Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 were examined and they were regularized as General Line Teachers. However, petitioner No. 5 could not be regularized as General Line Teacher due to pending verification of his 10+2 qualification from the concerned Board. The respondents, vide communication dated 17.01.2018, sought verification of the said S. No. 22

CPSW No. 420/2016

qualification of respondent No. 5 from the Board of High School and Intermediate Education, Uttar Pradesh, who vide communication dated 15.10.2025 forwarded a copy of the verification report stating that no such roll number has been issued by the Authority.

3. In view of the fact that the verification has not been received, petitioner No. 5 is be at liberty to produce the certificates in his favour before the Director, School Education, Jammu, who shall consider the same along with the communication received from the concerned Board, and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.

4. Accordingly, the judgment stands complied, as such, the proceedings in the contempt petition are closed. However, petitioner No. 5 is at liberty to revive the contempt petition in case cause survives.

(Sindhu Sharma)

Judge

Jammu: 14.08.2026 Shafqat

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead