Jammu and Kashmir High Court
CM(M)/128/2026 of DAVINDER SUDAN Vs BIMLA SHARMA AND ANR on 14 August 2026
OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CM(M) No. 128/2026 CM No. 3971/2026 ‘ Davinder Sudan …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Navyug Sethi, Advocate. vs Bimla Sharma and another .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Rakesh Chargotra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sabhya
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
CM(M) No. 128/2026
CM No. 3971/2026
‘
Davinder Sudan
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Navyug Sethi, Advocate.
vs
Bimla Sharma and another
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Rakesh Chargotra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sabhya Gandhi, Advocate.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
14.08.2026
1. Mr. Rakesh Chargotra, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the contesting respondents submits that the order dated 04.05.2026 be modified to the extent of directing the parties to main status quo qua the suit property and further the learned trial court be requested to decide the application for grant of interim relief within the statutory period.
2. Mr. Navyug Sethi, learned counsel for the petitioner has accepted the submission made by Mr. Rakesh Chargotra.
3. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of by modifying the order impugned to the extent that the parties shall maintain status quo qua the suit property and further the learned trial court is requested to decide the application for grant of interim relief within the statutory period. Serial No. 113
2 CM(M) No. 128/2026
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Senior counsel for the contesting respondents have assured this Court that they will not seek any unnecessary adjournment from the trial court.
5. It is made clear that this order has been passed only on the consensus of the parties and this Court has not examined the merits of the claims of the parties.
6. Disposed of along with the connected application.
(RAJNESH OSWAL)
JUDGE
Jammu 14.08.2026 Sahil Padha
Sahil Padha 2026.08.14 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document