Jammu and Kashmir High Court

WP(C)/480/2023 of M/S KHAJURIA BANQUET HALL GHO RAKHWALAN SAMBA TH DHERU RAM SAMBA Vs U T OF J AND K TH CHAIRMAN STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD NARWAL JAMMU AND OTHERS on 10 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Case: - WP(C) No. 480/2023 M/S Khajuria Banquet Hall …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Atul Verma, Advocate vs UT of J&K and Ors. .…. Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Meenakshi Slathia, Dy.AG Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT JAMMU

Case: - WP(C) No. 480/2023

M/S Khajuria Banquet Hall

…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)

Through: Mr. Atul Verma, Advocate

vs

UT of J&K and Ors.

.…. Respondent(s)

Through: Ms. Meenakshi Slathia, Dy.AG

Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

10.08.2026

1. The petitioner had filed the instant petition seeking the quashing of the order dated 03.02.2023, whereby respondent No. 2 has directed closure of the banquet hall being run by the petitioner under the name and style of M/S Khajuria Banquet Hall.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that, in terms of the guidelines issued by the erstwhile Jammu and Kashmir State Pollution Control Board, provision for STP/ETP is required only in case of banquet halls, where the capacity of the banquet hall exceeds 200 persons. It is submitted that the capacity of the petitioner’s banquet hall does not exceed 200 persons.

3. The respondents have filed their response objecting the claim of the petitioner. However, Ms. Meenakshi Slathia, learned Deputy Advocate General, appearing for the respondents, submits that vide notice dated 08.08.2026, revised classification of hotels, motels, resorts, restaurants, Dhabas, Eateries and standalone Banquet/Marriage halls has been notified. Serial No. 29

-2-

4. Learned counsel for the respondents further submits that the case of the petitioner shall be considered in accordance with the revised guidelines.

5. It is relevant to note that, vide order dated 09.03.2023, this Court had stayed the operation of the impugned order dated 03.02.2023.

6. In view of the aforesaid, the present petition is disposed of by directing respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to consider the claim of the petitioner in light of the revised guidelines issued vide notice referred to above and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law, after affording due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

7. Till such consideration is made and an appropriate order is passed, the interim order dated 09.03.2023 shall continue to remain in operation.

8. Disposed of.

(RAJNESH OSWAL)

JUDGE

Jammu 10.08.2026 AKHILESH

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead