Jammu and Kashmir High Court

WP(C)/2442/2026 of IMRAN CHOUDHARY AND ANOTHER Vs UT OF J AND K TH. COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS on 7 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

200 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Uploaded on: 07.08.2026 WP(C) No. 2442/2026 Imran Choudhary and Anr. …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Kamal Mangotra, Advocate q vs Union Territory of J&K and ors. .…. Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Sagira Jaffer,

Sr. No. 200

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT JAMMU

Uploaded on: 07.08.2026

WP(C) No. 2442/2026

Imran Choudhary and Anr.

…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)

Through: Mr. Kamal Mangotra, Advocate

q

vs

Union Territory of

J&K and ors.

.…. Respondent(s)

Through: Ms. Sagira Jaffer, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG

Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

07.08.2026

01. The grievance of the petitioners is that being majors, they have solemnized their marriage as per Muslim rites on 28.07.2026 with their free will and without any pressure, threat or coercion. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the respondent Nos. 6 to 8 are continuously harassing and threatening the petitioners of dire consequences despite knowing the fact that the petitioners have solemnized their marriage. The petitioners have raised an apprehension of a threat to their life at the hands of private respondents. In support of their claim regarding their age, petitioner No. 1 has placed on record copy of Grade Card of the Central Board of School Education, whereas the petitioner No. 2 has place on record copy of the Grade Card of Secondary School Examination. They have also placed on

2 WP(C) No. 2442/2026

record a copy of the Nikahnama in support of their claim that they have solemnized their marriage.

02. Without commenting upon the validity of the marriage, this writ petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to the petitioners that in the event they apprehend any threat to their life and liberty at the hands of the respondent Nos. 6 to 8, they shall approach respondent No. 4 i.e. SHO, Police Station, Surankote, Poonch, who shall look into the grievance of the petitioners and if found genuine, he shall provide protection to the petitioners against the threats from respondent Nos. 6 to 8. It is, however, made clear that this order shall not be construed as a stamp of approval of the marriage solemnized between the petitioners, nor shall it come in the way of any investigation, if any FIR has been registered.

03. Disposed of.

(RAJNESH OSWAL)

JUDGE

Jammu 07.08.2026 Karam Chand

Whether the order is speaking:

Yes/No

Whether the order is reportable:

Yes/No KARAM CHAND 2026.08.07 17:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead