Jammu and Kashmir High Court

TrP (C)/57/2023 of IRFANA BANO Vs MOHD SAJID on 27 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU TrP (C) No. 57/2023 CM No. 7158/2023 Irfana Bano …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Mohd. Avais Choudhary, Advocate. vs Mohd. Sajid .…. Respondent(s) Through: None. Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE ORDER

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT JAMMU

TrP (C) No. 57/2023

CM No. 7158/2023

Irfana Bano

…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)

Through: Mr. Mohd. Avais Choudhary, Advocate.

vs

Mohd. Sajid

.…. Respondent(s)

Through: None.

Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

27.07.2026

1. The petitioner, who happens to be wife of the respondent, has filed this petition for transfer of the suit bearing file No. 05/suit titled “Mohd. Sajid vs. Irfana Bano and others” pending before the court of Sub- Judge, Nowshera, Rajouri to any other court of competent jurisdiction at Jammu.

2. It is stated that the petitioner has also filed a petition under section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, which is pending before the court of 2nd Additional Munsiff (JMIC), Jammu. The petitioner has also stated that it is not convenient for her to contest the petition at Rajouri.

3. In terms of order dated 02.12.2023, proceedings of the suit titled “Mohd. Sajid vs. Irfana Bano and others” were stayed.

4. A perusal of the order dated 02.02.2024 passed by the learned Registrar Judicial of this Court reveals that the respondent stands Serial No. 17

2 TrP (C) No. 57/2023

served, however, despite service, the respondent has chosen not to object to the present petition.

5. In view of the fact that the petitioner has already filed a petition under section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 and the petitioner does not have any source of income to contest the suit at Rajouri and more particularly as the respondent has chosen not to object to the present petition, the instant petition is allowed and the suit titled “Mohd. Sajid vs. Irfana Bano and others” is transferred from the court of Sub-Judge, Nowshera, Rajouri to the court of learned Principal District Judge, Jammu, who shall assign the same to any other court of competent jurisdiction at Jammu.

6. Sub-Judge, Nowshera, Rajouri shall transmit the record of the suit titled “Mohd. Sajid vs. Irfana Bano and others” to Principal District Judge, Jammu.

7. Disposed of along with the connected application.

(RAJNESH OSWAL)

JUDGE

Jammu 27.07.2026 Sahil Padha

Sahil Padha 2026.07.27 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead