Jammu and Kashmir High Court

WP(C)/104/2025 of SUNIL GANDOTRA Vs J AND K SPECIAL TRIBUNAL TH REGISTRAR JAMMU AND OTHERS on 21 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Case: WP(C) No. 104/2025 Sunil Gandotra …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: None vs J&K Special Tribunal and Ors. .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Anuj Dewan Raina, Advocate for R-3 Mr. Mayank Gupta, Advocate for R-2 Coram:

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT JAMMU

Case: WP(C) No. 104/2025

Sunil Gandotra

…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)

Through: None

vs

J&K Special Tribunal and Ors.

.…. Respondent(s)

Through: Mr. Anuj Dewan Raina, Advocate for R-3

Mr. Mayank Gupta, Advocate for R-2

Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

21.07.2026

1. The prayer made in the present petition is for quashing the order dated 16.05.2024, whereby the application preferred by the petitioner for transfer of appeal filed by him under Section 7(3) of the Control of Building Operation Act, 1988 against the order of dated 17.10.2022, from Bench-III to any other available Bench, has been rejected.

2. Though respondent No. 3 has filed the response, but learned counsel for respondent No. 3 submits that he has no objection if the appeal is transferred to any Bench of the J&K Special Tribunal, Jammu, particularly in view of fact that vide order dated 20.01.2025, passed by this Court, the operation of the order impugned has been stayed.

3. Mr. Mayank Gupta, learned counsel submits that appropriate orders may be passed.

4. Without commenting upon the merits of the order dated 16.05.2024, and in view of the statements made hereinabove, the present is disposed of by Serial No. 87

WP(C) No. 104/2025 Page 2 of 2

transferring the appeal filed by the petitioner pending before Bench No. III to Bench No. II of the J&K Special Tribunal, Jammu.

5. Bench No. II is requested to decide the appeal as expeditiously as possible in accordance with the law after affording opportunity of hearing to the contesting parties. Since the petitioner has not caused appearance before this Court, as such, the learned Tribunal shall issue notice to him, in the event, he does not cause appearance before the learned Tribunal.

6. The record of the appeal shall be transferred from Bench No. III to Bench No. II.

7. Disposed of.

(RAJNESH OSWAL)

JUDGE

Jammu 21.07.2026 AKHILESH

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead