Jammu and Kashmir High Court
WP(C)/2877/2024 of MUNISH KUMAR Vs UNION OF INDIA TH MINISTRY OF STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION NEW DELHI AND OTHERS on 17 July 2026
OF JAMMU, KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 2877/2024 Munish Kumar …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Rohit Kotwal, Adv. q vs Union of India and others .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Anishwar Chatterji Koul, CGSC vice Mr. Vishal Sharma, DSGI Coram: HON’BLE MR.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU, KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 2877/2024
Munish Kumar
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Rohit Kotwal, Adv.
q
vs
Union of India and others
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Anishwar Chatterji Koul, CGSC vice Mr. Vishal Sharma, DSGI
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
17.07.2026
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been appointed as constable in Central Armed Police Forces(CAPF) as a Constable (General Duty), as such, the present petition has been rendered infructuous.
2. Ordered accordingly.
3. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner be granted liberty to avail appropriate remedy as available under law for seeking notional benefits vis a vis his subsequent appointment.
4. Needless to say that no such permission is required to the petitioner.
(RAJNESH OSWAL)
JUDGE
Jammu 17.07.2026 Rakesh PS
67 Rakesh Kumar 2026.07.20 14:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Jammu