Jammu and Kashmir High Court
CPSW/158/2017 of SHAIDA BANO Vs DHEERAJ GUPTA SECY.P.D.D.AND ORS. on 17 July 2026
OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CPSW No. 158/2017 in SWP No. 209/2004 Shaida Bano …. Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through:- None V/s Dheeraj Gupta Secy. P.D.D. and others …..Respondent(s) Through:- None CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE ORDER 17.07.2026
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
CPSW No. 158/2017 in
SWP No. 209/2004
Shaida Bano
…. Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through:-
None
V/s
Dheeraj Gupta Secy. P.D.D. and
others
…..Respondent(s)
Through:-
None
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
17.07.2026
1. The proceedings in this contempt petition are initiated for non- compliance of order dated 12.08.2016, passed in SWP No. 209/2004, vide which, the respondents were directed to consider and determine the eligibility of petitioner No. 2 for ex-gratia relief in terms of SRO-43 of 1994.
2. The compliance report has been filed by the respondents, in which, they have passed Order No. CEJPDCL/Court/16 of 2022 dated 26.12.2022, vide which, the claim of the petitioner has been rejected being devoid of merit.
3. In view of the aforesaid, order dated 12.08.2016 stands complied. Accordingly, the proceedings in the contempt petition are closed. The petitioner is at liberty to challenge the consideration order, if advised.
(SINDHU SHARMA)
JUDGE
Jammu: 17.07.2026 VISHAL KHAJURIA
S. No. 27