Jammu and Kashmir High Court

WP(C)/998/2024 of ASHOK KUMAR Vs U T OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY HOUSING AND URBAN DEV DEPTT AND OTHERS on 14 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 998/2024 Ashok Kumar …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Vikas Mangotra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Nitin Dubey, Advocate vs UT of J&K and ors. .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG with Ms. Sagira Jaffer,

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT JAMMU

WP(C) No. 998/2024

Ashok Kumar

…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)

Through: Mr. Vikas Mangotra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Nitin Dubey, Advocate

vs

UT of J&K and ors.

.…. Respondent(s)

Through: Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG with Ms. Sagira Jaffer, Advocate Mr. Sachin Dogra, Advocate with Mr. Rahul Parihar, Advocate Ms. Monika Thakur, Advocate

Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

14.07.2026

1. Learned Senior counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the proceedings in the present petition be closed for the time being as the petitioner is facing trial for the commission of offence under Section 304-II IPC before the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jammu. He further submits that the trial has almost reached at the stage of its conclusion as only two witnesses remain to be examined. Therefore, he submits that the learned trial court be requested to expedite the proceedings so that the remaining two witnesses are also examined without any delay.

2. Prayer made by the learned Senior counsel for the petitioner is not opposed by Mr. Sachin Dogra, Advocate.

3. In view of the above, the proceedings in the present petition are closed for the time being with liberty to the petitioner to get the same revived after the charge sheet filed against the petitioner is decided by the Serial No. 148

2 WP(C) No. 998/2024

learned trial court. In view of the fact that the petitioner has attained superannuation in the year 2021, so the learned trial court is requested to expedite the proceedings and not to grant adjournments unnecessarily to the prosecution as well as the petitioner.

4. Disposed of accordingly.

5. (RAJNESH OSWAL)

JUDGE

Jammu 14.07.2026 Neha-II

NEHA KUMARI 2026.07.14 16:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead