Jammu and Kashmir High Court
HCP/46/2026 of MUKESH KUMAR Vs UT OF J AND K TH. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS on 13 July 2026
OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU HCP No. 46/2026 CM No. 3554/2026 Mukesh Kumar …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Nirmal Kotwal, Sr. Advocate with Assisting counsel vs UT of J&K and ors. .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG with Ms. Sagira
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
HCP No. 46/2026
CM No. 3554/2026
Mukesh Kumar
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Nirmal Kotwal, Sr. Advocate with Assisting counsel
vs
UT of J&K and ors.
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG with Ms. Sagira Jaffer, Advocate for R-1 to 3
Ms. Mandeep Reen, Sr. Advocate with
Assisting counsel for R-4
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
13.07.2026
1. Ms. Mandeep Reen, learned Senior counsel appearing for respondent No. 4 submits that on the previous date of hearing, respondent No. 4 had produced his daughter before this Court and due to absence of learned counsel for the petitioner, the matter could not be considered.
2. After perusing the pleadings of the writ petition and the compromise deed in particular, this Court is of the considered view that the present petition is not maintainable particularly when there is no marriage agreement between the petitioner and daughter of respondent No. 4.
3. The present petition is not maintainable, as such, the same is dismissed.
4. Mr. Nirmal Kotwal, learned Senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner be permitted to avail appropriate remedy as available under law. Needless to say that the petitioner does not require any liberty from this Court.
5. (RAJNESH OSWAL)
JUDGE
Jammu 13.07.2026 Neha-II
Serial No. 18 NEHA KUMARI 2026.07.13 16:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document