Jammu and Kashmir High Court
Bail App/135/2026 of VIKRANT KOTWAL Vs UT OF J AND K TH. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION,SAMBA on 10 July 2026
OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Bail App No. 135/2026 Vikrant Kotwal, Age 33 years S/O Rajinder Kumar Kotwal R/O Jallo Chak, Tehsil Bahu District Jammu …..Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. K. Nirmal Kotwal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Pawan Dev Singh, Advocate. Vs Union Territory of Jammu
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
Bail App No. 135/2026
Vikrant Kotwal, Age 33 years
S/O Rajinder Kumar Kotwal
R/O Jallo Chak, Tehsil Bahu
District Jammu
…..Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. K. Nirmal Kotwal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Pawan Dev Singh, Advocate.
Vs
Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir
Through Station House Officer,
Police Station Samba,
Tehsil & District Samba.
.…. Respondent(s)
Through:
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M A CHOWDHARY, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
(10.07.2026)
01. Petitioner, through the medium of this petition, having been unsuccessful to seek bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered vide FIR No.178/2026 on 22.06.2026 at Police Station Samba for the commission of offences punishable U/Ss 69, 83, 88 and 115(2) of BNSS, 2023, has approached this court seeking the same relief.
02. On perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Samba vide his order dated 06.07.2026 in case No.201/2026 titled ‘Vikrant Kotwal V. UT of J&K through Police Station Samba’, has dismissed the application on the sole ground that the petitioner had failed to appear in person at the time of filing of the bail Serial No. 96 Supplementary List-III
2 Bail App No.135/2026
application as well as at the time of consideration of the application and the application has not been considered on merits.
03. This court is of the view that the court below has taken an erroneous view to reject application for grant of bail in anticipation of arrest, for absence of applicant.
04. After arguing for a while, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of this petition with liberty to file fresh Bail Application before the competent Court of Sessions at Samba, so that his plea for grant of bail is addressed on merits.
05. The bail application is disposed of, with liberty as prayed above.
(M A CHOWDHARY) JUDGE JAMMU
10.07.2026
Raj Kumar
Raj Kumar 2026.07.10 17:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document