Jammu and Kashmir High Court
SWP/549/2019 of MINAKSHI RAINA Vs STATE TH.EDUCATION DEPTT.AND ORS. on 8 July 2026
OF JAMMU, KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU SWP No. 549/2019 Minakshi Raina …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Shamas Ud Din Shaaz, Adv. q vs State of J&K and others .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG with Ms. Saleeqa Sheikh, Adv. Coram: HON’BLE MR.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU, KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
SWP No. 549/2019
Minakshi Raina
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Shamas Ud Din Shaaz, Adv.
q
vs
State of J&K and others
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG with
Ms. Saleeqa Sheikh, Adv.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
08.07.2026
1. While arguing the matter, Mr. Shamas Ud Din Shaaz, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has drawn the attention of this Court towards the earlier round of litigation initiated by one Archana Bakshi by way of writ petition bearing SWP No. 1908/2014, in which the petitioner was arrayed as a party respondent. The said petition was dismissed vide order dated 19.12.2015. Thereafter the LPA preferred against the said order was also dismissed vide order dated 24.08.2016. Mr. Shaaz has also drawn the attention of this Court towards the Special Leave Petition bearing Civil Appeal No. 6890/2024 filed by the petitioner, which was one of the clubbed petitions decided by the Supreme Court in case titled as U. T. of J&K and others vs. Saba Wani and others, in favour of the petitioner(s).
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition be disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner in terms of judgment rendered by the Supreme Court in U. T. of J&K and others vs. Saba Wani and others. Mr. Raman Sharma, 46
SWP No. 549/2019 Page 2 of 2
learned AAG submits that he has no objection, if case, the case of the petitioner is considered in terms of judgment(supra).
3. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner strictly in terms of the judgment of the Supreme Court (supra).
(RAJNESH OSWAL)
JUDGE
Jammu 08.07.2026 Rakesh PS
Rakesh Kumar 2026.07.10 14:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Jammu