Jammu and Kashmir High Court

SWP/2673/2018 of ROBEENA KOSSER Vs STATE TH.EDUCATION DEPTT.AND ORS. on 8 July 2026

Cites 1, Cited by 0

38 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU SWP No. 2673/2018 Robeena Kosser …. Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through:- None. V/s State of J&K & Ors. …..Respondent(s) Through:- Ms. Saliqa Sheikh, Advocate. CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE

Sr. No. 38

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT JAMMU

SWP No. 2673/2018

Robeena Kosser

…. Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)

Through:-

None.

V/s

State of J&K & Ors.

…..Respondent(s)

Through:-

Ms. Saliqa Sheikh, Advocate.

CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

1

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

08.07.2026

1. Earlier, the petitioner had filed SWP No. 1649/2018 which was disposed of in terms of order dated 18.08.2018 by commanding respondent Nos. 2 to 4 to consider the grievance as projected by the petitioner in the petition and take the selection process for engagement of ReT in GPS Thanamarg initiated vide advertisement notification No. CEO/R/11727-42 dated 18.07.2012 to its logical end, if there was no other legal impediment.

2. The petitioner through the medium of this petition has impugned Government Order No. 919-Edu of 2018 dated 16.11.2018 whereby the Rehbar-e-Taleem was formally closed and has also sought the issuance of direction to consider the claim of the petitioner for appointment as Rehbar-e-Taleem Teacher by keeping her out of the purview of the Government Order (supra).

3. The respondents in their response have solely relied upon the GO dated 16.11.2018 only for the purpose of objecting the claim of the petitioner.

SWP No. 2673/2018

2

4. Be that as it may, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in “UT of J&K v. Saba Wani, 2026 INSC 439”, has issued certain directions and this Court is of the considered view that the claim of the petitioner can be considered in the light of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India.

5. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of by commanding the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner in the light of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in “UT of J&K v. Saba Wani.”

(Rajnesh Oswal) Judge

JAMMU 08.07.2026. Neha-1

Neha Kumari 2026.07.09 10:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead