Jammu and Kashmir High Court
CPSW/498/2018 of BISHAMBER DASS Vs B.V.R. SUBRAHMNYAM , CHIEF SECY. on 29 June 2026
OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CPSW No. 498/2018 In SWP No. 472/2011 Bishamber Dass …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: None. vs BVR Subramanyam Chief Secy. .…. Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Saliqa Sheikh, Advocate vice Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG. Coram: HON’BLE MR.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
CPSW No. 498/2018
In SWP No. 472/2011
Bishamber Dass
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
vs
BVR Subramanyam Chief Secy.
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Saliqa Sheikh, Advocate vice Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
29.06.2026
1. In terms of order dated 08.12.2025, learned counsel for the petitioner had sought short adjournment in view of the decision taken by the respondent/contemnor in furtherance of the judgment which is subject matter of the present contempt petition.
2. On the previous date of hearing, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Today also, none has chosen to appear on behalf of the petitioner, which clearly demonstrates loss of interest on part of the petitioner in pursuing the instant contempt petition.
3. In view of the above, contempt proceedings are closed with liberty to the petitioner to revive the same in the event cause survives.
(RAJNESH OSWAL)
JUDGE
Jammu 29.06.2026 Sahil Padha
Serial No. 86 Sahil Padha 2026.06.29 16:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document