Jammu and Kashmir High Court

CCP(S)/269/2020 of BHARAT BHUSHAN AND ORS. Vs ASGAR HASSAN SAMOON SECRETARY SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPTT AND ANOTHER. on 6 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

3916/2026 in Page 1 of 3 CCP(S) No. 269/2020 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Case:- CM No. 3916/2026 in CCP(S) No. 269/2020 Bharat Bhushan and others …..Petitioners Through: Mr. Achal Sharma, Advocate Asgar Hassan Samoon, Secretary School Education Department and

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT JAMMU

Case:-

Bharat Bhushan and others

…..Petitioners

Through: Mr. Achal Sharma, Advocate

Asgar Hassan Samoon, Secretary School Education Department and another

.….Respondents

Through: None

Coram:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

06.06.2026

CM No. 3916/2026

01. The writ petition SWP No. 3427/2019 preferred by 22 petitioners came to be disposed of in terms of an order dated 20.09.2019 with a direction to the writ respondents to accord consideration to the claim of the writ petitioners having regard to the Govt. Order No. 940-Edu of 2017 dated 17.11.2017 read with SRO 339 dated 20.12.2005 provided the same being applicable to the case of the petitioners and they being eligible. Sr. No. 52 Suppl. 2 cause list

02. Complaining that the needful exercise at the end of the writ respondents was not being carried out, out of array of 22 petitioners, 9 petitioners came forward with the institution of the present contempt petition in December, 2020 which has remained pending on the docket of this Court all along the years.

03. Now the petitioners in the contempt petition are coming forward seeking withdrawal of present contempt petition for enabling them to challenge Govt. Order No. 360- JK (Edu) of 2023 dated 13.11.2023 as being the consideration order passed in compliance to the writ court directions.

04. The petitioners are seeking withdrawal of their contempt petition with liberty reserved in their favour to challenge the consideration order above referred.

05. Application is allowed.

06. Contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty reserved in favour of the present contempt petitioners only to resort to an appropriate legal course of action with respect to their grievance, be it individual or collective, against the Govt. Order No. 360-JK (Edu) of 2023 dated 13.11.2023 and the time spent during the pendency of this contempt

petition shall not come in the way of the present contempt petitioners with respect to their next legal course of action for which the liberty is hereby being given.

07. Application is, accordingly, disposed of.

(RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU

06.06.2026

Muneesh

Muneesh Sharma 2026.06.08 15:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead