Jammu and Kashmir High Court
CM(M)/38/2026 of GHULAM NABI AND ANOTHER Vs MOHD BASHIR on 2 June 2026
OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Case:- CM(M) No. 38/2026 Ghulam Nabi & Anr. …..Petitioners Through: None Vs Mohd Bashir .….Respondent(s) Through: Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE ORDER (02.06.2026) 1. The two petitioners came forward with
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
Case:- CM(M) No. 38/2026
Ghulam Nabi & Anr.
…..Petitioners
Through: None
Vs
Mohd Bashir
.….Respondent(s)
Through:
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
(02.06.2026)
1. The two petitioners came forward with institution of present writ petition on 21.02.2026 invoking article 227 of the Constitution of India for challenging orders dated 27.12.2025 & 26.04.2023 passed by the trial court of Munsiff (District Mobile Magistrate (T)), Rajouri in a civil suit titled “Mohd Bashir Vs Ghulam Nabi and Another”.
2. On the very first date of listing of this case before the Bench on 06.03.2026, nobody was present on behalf of the petitioners.
3. On next date of hearing i.e., 11.03.2026, due to non- appearance of the counsel for the petitioners, the case was dismissed for non-prosecution, only to be restored back in terms of an order dated 30.03.2026. Regular Cause List Serial No. 03
2
CM(M) No. 38/2026
4. Upon restoration, the case was listed on 21.04.2026 when this Court directed notice to the respondent and also directed the Registry to summon the digitized record from the court below.
5. Today, the counsel for the petitioners is again found absent. This is a definite pointer to the fact that the filing of present petition is nothing but an abuse of the process of law. As such, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU
02.06.2026
Sneha