Jammu and Kashmir High Court
CM(M)/99/2026 of HEM RAJ AND ANOTHER Vs UT OF J AND K TH. SECETARY POWER DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS on 22 May 2026
of 2 CM(M) No. 99/2026 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Date of Pronouncement : 22.05.2026 Uploaded on : 26.05.2026 CM(M) No. 99/2026 CM No. 3305/2026 Hem Raj & Anr. …..Petitioners Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate Vs UT of J&K & Ors. .….Respondents
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
Date of Pronouncement :
22.05.2026
Uploaded on :
26.05.2026
CM(M) No. 99/2026
CM No. 3305/2026
Hem Raj & Anr.
…..Petitioners
Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate
Vs
UT of J&K & Ors.
.….Respondents
Through: Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG with
Mr. Kartikay Sharma, Advocate
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
(22.05.2026)
01. This Court directs the learned Principal District Judge, Udhampur, to transfer the suit file which has been preferred by taking recourse to Order 33 of the J&K Code of Civil Procedure, Svt. 1977 to the court of learned Principal District Judge, Reasi so as to salvage the institution of the suit of the petitioners, in terms whereof the petitioners as plaintiffs, have come forward asking for compensation relatable to the death of their son, Pawan Singh, who is said to have suffered Serial No. 82 Supplementary List-1
electrocution on 14.03.2012 at Banganga (Katra), district Reasi.
02. Upon transfer of the civil suit file to the court of learned Principal District Judge, Reasi and upon entertaining of the suit on its file, the petitioners are reserved with their right to approach this Court seeking transfer of the civil suit by reference to the fact that they are residents of district Udhampur and are economically weaker persons not in a position to pursue their civil suit before the court of learned Principal District Judge, Reasi by undertaking travel and other related expenses which in the event of the civil suit being adjudicated by the District Court, Udhampur would not be accruing to the petitioners.
03. The petition is thus, disposed of, accordingly.
(RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU
22.05.2026
SUNIL
Whether the order is speaking ? : Yes/No
Whether the order is reportable ? : Yes/No