Jammu and Kashmir High Court

CM(M)/67/2026 of HARJEET SINGH AND OTHERS Vs UT OF J AND K TH REGIONAL DIRECTOR SURVEY AND LAND RECORDS AND OTHERS on 8 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2 CM (M) No. 67/2026 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Pronounced on : 08.05.2026 Uploaded on : 12.05.2026 CM (M) No. 67/2026 CM No. 2311/2026 Harjeet Singh & Ors. …..Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate Vs UT of J&K & Ors.

Page 1 of 2 CM (M) No. 67/2026

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT JAMMU

Pronounced on :

08.05.2026

Uploaded on : 12.05.2026

CM (M) No. 67/2026

CM No. 2311/2026

Harjeet Singh & Ors.

…..Petitioners

Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate

Vs

UT of J&K & Ors.

.….Respondents

Through:

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

(08.05.2026)

01. The Examination Counter came to identify eight (8) numbers of defects related to the present petition which are as under :- I. All pages are not signed by learned counsel ; II. Information not mentioned of identifier, petitioners not mentioned ; III. Age of petitioners not mentioned ; IV. Annexures not attested ; V. Page No. 27 hand written ; VI. Page No. 28 to 30 not legible ; VII. Court fees not attached and VIII. Details of respondents not mentioned.

Serial No. 03 Regular List

Page 2 of 2 CM (M) No. 67/2026

02. This Court, in terms of an order dated 30.03.2026, granted time of two days for the petitioners to do the course correction with respect to the defects notified and the same was to be done within a period of two days.

03. The needful having not been done resulted in further extension of time of ten days by this Court in terms of an order dated 07.04.2026 which time came to be further extended by two weeks in terms of an order dated 21.04.2026 related to table amendment with respect to the prayer made in the writ petition meaning thereby the other defects are said to have been removed.

04. The nature of the defects with which this petition is afflicted, this Court is now not interested to extend further time and therefore, allows the learned counsel for the petitioners to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one within a period of next fifteen days.

05. Learned counsel for the petitioners to ensure that the fresh writ petition to be filed is free of any such defects as came to be notified with respect to the present writ petition.

06. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty granted.

(RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU

08.05.2026

SUNIL

Whether the order is speaking ? : Yes/No Whether the order is reportable ? : Yes/No

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead