Jammu and Kashmir High Court
CM(M)/80/2026 of JOGINDER SINGH AND OTHERS Vs SURESH KOHLI AND OTHJERS on 4 May 2026
OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Case:- CM(M) No. 80/2026 Joginder Singh & Ors. …..Petitioners Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate Vs Suresh Kohli & Ors. .….Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Achal Sharma, Advocate with Ms. Shreya Rajput, Advocate for Caveator Coram:
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
Case:- CM(M) No. 80/2026
Joginder Singh & Ors.
…..Petitioners
Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate
Vs
Suresh Kohli & Ors.
.….Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Achal Sharma, Advocate with Ms. Shreya Rajput, Advocate for Caveator
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
(04.05.2026)
1. Eleven petitioners (11) are the plaintiffs in a civil suit which they have filed for seeking permanent prohibitory injunction against the respondents No. 1 & 2 as being the contesting defendants before the 2nd Additional Munsiff, Jammu.
2. The court of learned 2nd Additional Munsiff, Jammu, by virtue of an order dated 18.11.2024 has dismissed the temporary injunction application of the petitioners against which the petitioners ventured to file a civil miscellaneous appeal under order XLII Rule 1 (R) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 before the 2nd Additional District Judge, Jammu, which has also resulted in failure in terms of an order dated 30.03.2026.
3. Now, the petitioners have stretched themselves to coming to the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir & Ladakh seeking its supervisory jurisdiction but without even bothering to annex a copy Regular List Serial No. 03
2
CM(M) No. 80/2026
of the plaint, written statement as well as memo of appeal in certified form for the sake of perusal of this Court, in the light of which the adjudication made by the courts below came to be carried out.
4. This Court is not meant for the reminder to the learned counsel for the petitioners that the essential pleadings are required to be put up along with petition under article 227 of the Constitution of India and, therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant indulgence in the present matter and, therefore, dismisses the same.
5. A copy of this order be provided to court of learned 2nd Additional Munsiff, Jammu for notice and compliance.
(RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU
04.05.2026
Sneha