Jammu and Kashmir High Court
SWP/1214/2011 of SANTOSH SHARMA Vs STATE TH.EDUCATION DEPTT.AND ORS. on 24 April 2026
OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU SWP No. 1214/2011 IA No. 1781/2011 Santosh Sharma …..Petitioner Through: Ms. Damini Singh Chauhan, Advocate. Vs State of J&K & Ors. .….Respondents Through: Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI,
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
SWP No. 1214/2011
IA No. 1781/2011
Santosh Sharma
…..Petitioner
Through: Ms. Damini Singh Chauhan, Advocate.
Vs
State of J&K & Ors.
.….Respondents
Through: Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
(24.04.2026)
01. During pendency of writ petition due to subsequent developments, the cause and purpose of the writ petition has been rendered infructuous but a thin hope of the petitioner that an outcome from the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India related to ReT matters may be providing a scope for petitioner to pursue her cause.
02. Whether that option would be available to the petitioner is for the petitioner to figure out but, nevertheless, this Court dismisses this petition as having been rendered infructuous with liberty reserved in favour of the petitioner that in case, pursuant to the final verdict of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, the petitioner would reckon that the cause of action which led her to come up with the present writ petition gets re-birth, then a motion Serial No. 13 Regular List
2
SWP No. 1214/2011 IA No. 1781/2011
for seeking restoration of the writ petition can be filed by the petitioner providing the same is done within a period of 90 days from the date of verdict of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India.
03. Interim direction, if any whatsoever, shall stand vacated.
(RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU
24.04.2026
Bunty
Bunty Kumar 2026.04.27 19:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document