Jammu and Kashmir High Court
SWP/421/2014 of RAMESH LAL Vs STATE TH.EDUCATION DEPTT.AND ORS. on 24 April 2026
OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU SWP No. 421/2014 CM No. 6293/2019 IA No. 02/2018 IA No. 01/2018 IA No. 596/2014 Ramesh Lal …..Petitioner Through: Mrs. Surinder Kour, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Manpreet Kour, Advocate. Vs State of J&K & Ors. .….Respondents Through:
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
SWP No. 421/2014
CM No. 6293/2019
IA No. 02/2018
IA No. 01/2018
IA No. 596/2014
Ramesh Lal
…..Petitioner
Through: Mrs. Surinder Kour, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Manpreet Kour, Advocate.
Vs
State of J&K & Ors.
.….Respondents
Through: Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
(24.04.2026)
01. During pendency of writ petition due to subsequent developments, the cause and purpose of the writ petition has been rendered infructuous but a thin hope of the petitioner that an outcome from the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India related to ReT matters may be providing a scope for petitioner to pursue his cause.
02. Whether that option would be available to the petitioner is for the petitioner to figure out but, nevertheless, this Court dismisses this petition as having been rendered infructuous with liberty reserved in favour of the petitioner that in case, pursuant to the final verdict of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, the Serial No. 16 Regular List
2
SWP No. 421/2014
petitioner would reckon that the cause of action which led him to come up with the present writ petition gets re-birth, then a motion for seeking restoration of the writ petition can be filed by the petitioner providing the same is done within a period of 90 days from the date of verdict of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India.
03. Interim direction, if any whatsoever, shall stand vacated.
(RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU
24.04.2026
Bunty
Bunty Kumar 2026.04.27 19:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document