Jammu and Kashmir High Court
SWP/1424/2006 of ANITA DEVI Vs STATE TH.EDU.DEPTT on 24 April 2026
OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU SWP No. 1424/2006 IA No. 1748/2006 Anita Devi …..Petitioner Through: Mr. R. K. S. Thakur, Advocate. Vs State of J&K & Ors. .….Respondents Through: Mr. Pawan Dev Singh, Dy. AG. Mrs. Aruna Thakur, Advocate for R-6 & 7. CORAM:
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
SWP No. 1424/2006
IA No. 1748/2006
Anita Devi
…..Petitioner
Through: Mr. R. K. S. Thakur, Advocate.
Vs
State of J&K & Ors.
.….Respondents
Through: Mr. Pawan Dev Singh, Dy. AG.
Mrs. Aruna Thakur, Advocate for R-6 & 7.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
(24.04.2026)
01. During pendency of writ petition due to subsequent developments, the cause and purpose of the writ petition has been rendered infructuous but a thin hope of the petitioner that an outcome from the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India related to ReT matters may be providing a scope for petitioner to pursue her cause.
02. Whether that option would be available to the petitioner is for the petitioner to figure out but, nevertheless, this Court dismisses this petition as having been rendered infructuous with liberty reserved in favour of the petitioner that in case, pursuant to the final verdict of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, the petitioner would reckon that the cause of action which led her to Serial No. 08 Regular List
2
SWP No. 1424/2006 IA No. 1748/2006
come up with the present writ petition gets re-birth, then a motion for seeking restoration of the writ petition can be filed by the petitioner providing the same is done within a period of 90 days from the date of verdict of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India.
03. Interim direction, if any whatsoever, shall stand vacated.
(RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU
24.04.2026
Bunty
Bunty Kumar 2026.04.27 19:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document