Jammu and Kashmir High Court
WP(C)/1010/2026 of SHAKEEL AHMED AND OTHERS Vs UT OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS on 20 April 2026
1010/2026 Page 1 of 3 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 1010/2026 CM No. 2232/2026 CM No. 2233/2026 Date of pronouncement : 20.04.2026 Uploaded on : 22.04.2026 Shakeel Ahmed & Ors. …..Petitioners Through:- Mr. Nitin Verma, Advocate. V/s UT of J&K
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 1010/2026 CM No. 2232/2026 CM No. 2233/2026
Date of pronouncement : 20.04.2026
Uploaded on : 22.04.2026
Shakeel Ahmed & Ors.
…..Petitioners
Through:- Mr. Nitin Verma, Advocate.
V/s
UT of J&K & Ors.
…..Respondents
Through:- Mr. Suneel Malhotra, GA.
\ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
ORDER (ORAL)
01. This writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. 2-Directorate of Urban Local Bodies, Jammu to consider the grievance of the petitioners about their purported non-inclusion in the publication of ULB-wise list of Casual Safai Karamcharis despite the fact that the petitioners claim to be in continuing engagement and employment of Municipal Committee, Thanamandi, wherein Serial No. 12 Regular List
30-odd number of Safai Karamcharis are in engagement out of which six petitioners find themselves excluded from consideration zone for regularization exercise while they are said to be similarly situated as the respondent Nos. 4 to 30 who find themselves in the zone of consideration by reference to Municipal Committee, Thanamandi.
02. The respondent No. 2-Directorate of Urban Local Bodies, Jammu is directed to consider the present writ petition as a representation of the petitioners and come forward with a reason bearing consideration order as to whether the grievance of the petitioners genuine and is redressable from his end or is without any basis and liable to be rejected and, if so, then by show of reasons to pass an order to said effect.
03. Copy of this writ petition along with annexures be provided to Mr. Suneel Malhotra, learned GA for the sake of serving as representation to land in the hands of the respondent No. 2-Directorate of Urban Local Bodies, Jammu.
04. Needful exercise to be done at the end of the respondent No. 2-Directorate of Urban Local Bodies, Jammu by or before 15.05.2026.
05. A disposal of the present writ petition in this manner shall not prejudice the right of the petitioners to approach this Court in case their grievances remain unaddressed or unredressed as directed at the end of the respondent No. 2-Directorate of Urban Local Bodies, Jammu.
06. The present writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of along with connected applications.
(RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU
20.04.2026
Bunty
Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No Bunty Kumar 2026.04.22 10:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document