Jammu and Kashmir High Court

MA/62/2025 of KARTAR UPKAR ASSOCIATES TH THAKUR ASHWANI SINGH Vs BHARTI AIRTEL LTD TH SECRETARY, NEW DELHI AND ANOTHER on 10 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU MA No. 62/2025 Kartar Upkar Associates …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) ) Through: Mr. Vikram Rathore, Adv. vs Bharti Airtel Ltd and anr. .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Dheeraj Nanda, Adv. Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL,

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT JAMMU

MA No. 62/2025

Kartar Upkar Associates

…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)

)

Through: Mr. Vikram Rathore, Adv.

vs

Bharti Airtel Ltd and anr.

.…. Respondent(s)

Through: Mr. Dheeraj Nanda, Adv.

Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

10.04.2026 ORAL:

1. After we had heard learned counsel for both the sides at a considerable length, learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant be permitted to withdraw suit for consequential relief of permanent prohibitory injunction in restraining the defendants, i.e. respondents herein, from damaging, changing, sub-letting or creating any third-party rights of the rented premises in any manner whatsoever.

2. Mr. Dheeraj Nanda, learned counsel for the respondents, is not averse to the submissions made by Mr. Vikram Rathore, learned counsel for the appellant. However, at the same time, he submits that the respondents’ right be reserved to file written statement within statutory period. This submission is not opposed and rather conceded by the learned counsel for the appellant.

3. In view of the above and more particularly as the parties have consented for disposal of the appeal pursuant to the consensus arrived at between the parties, this appeal is allowed. The order impugned is set 11

MA No. 62/2025 Page 2 of 2

aside. The appellant is permitted to withdraw his suit with reference to the consequential relief referred above as sought by the appellant.

4. The appellant shall file an amended plaint within 14 days from the date fixed for appearance before the learned trial court. Thereafter, the respondents shall be at liberty to file the written statement within statutory period to the amended plaint.

5. Parties shall appear before the court on 08.05.2026.

6. The record of the trial court be sent back forthwith, if received in original.

7. Disposed of. (RAHUL BHARTI) (RAJNESH OSWAL)

JUDGE JUDGE

Jammu 10.04.2026 Rakesh PS

Whether the judgment is speaking: Yes/No

Whether the judgment is reportable: Yes/No

Rakesh Kumar 2026.04.17 13:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Jammu

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead