Jammu and Kashmir High Court

WP(C)/655/2026 of CHOTU RAM AND ANOTHER Vs UT OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS on 12 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No.655/2026 Chotu Ram & Anr. ….Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through :- Mr. Varun Kotwal, Adv. V/s UT of J & K & Ors. ….Respondent(s) Through :- Ms. Nazia Fazal, Adv., vice Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG for R1&2. Mr. Vipan

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU

WP(C) No.655/2026

Chotu Ram & Anr.

….Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)

Through :- Mr. Varun Kotwal, Adv.

V/s

UT of J & K & Ors.

….Respondent(s)

Through :- Ms. Nazia Fazal, Adv., vice

Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG for R1&2.

Mr. Vipan Gandotra, Adv for R-3 to 5.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M A CHOWDHARY, JUDGE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

12.03.2026

1. Petitioners claiming to be owners of land comprising of Khasra Nos.87 and 88, situated at Village Suketar, Tehsil Dansal, Jammu, over which house and structure has been constructed, which had been used by the respondents for construction of Delhi-Amritsar-Katra Expressway and the petitioner’s property had been acquired vide Award dated 05.12.2024 by competent authority for land acquisition (Deputy Commissioner) Jammu and as per the Award roll, the petitioners have been held entitled to compensation assessed by the competent authority, however, the amount so assessed has not been released in favour of the petitioners so far, though the amount of compensation is stated to have been deposited with the competent authority by the indenting agency.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners shall be satisfied, in case, this petition is disposed of, at this stage, with a direction to the respondents to release the compensation for their acquired land, within certain time frame. Sr. No. 98

2 WP(C) No.655/2026

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submit that the respondents shall not be averse to the consideration of the matter, as submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners.

4. In view of the pleadings, facts and circumstances and submissions urged by learned counsel for the petitioners, this petition is, disposed of, at its threshold, with a direction to the respondents to consider for release of compensation in favour of the petitioners for their acquired land for construction of Delhi-Amritsar-Katra Expressway, in terms of Award dated 05.12.2024 passed by the competent authority for land acquisition-Deputy Commissioner, Jammu, expeditiously.

5. Disposed of, as above, along with connected application.

Jammu: 12.03.2026 Surinder

(M A Chowdhary) Judge

Surinder Kumar 2026.03.05 00:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead