Jammu and Kashmir High Court

WP(C)/532/2026 of KAWEL RANI Vs JAMMU MUNICIPAL CORPORATION TH ITS COMMISSIONER ND OTHERS on 2 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

151 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP (C) No. 532/2026 CM No. 1231/2026 Date of pronouncement: 02.03.2026 Uploaded on: 03.03.2026 Kawel Rani, Age 72 Years W/O Sh. Vijay Kumar Anand, R/O Extension-D, Near Heritage School, Sainik Colony, Jammu ….

Sr. No. 151

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT JAMMU

WP (C) No. 532/2026

CM No. 1231/2026

Date of pronouncement: 02.03.2026

Uploaded on: 03.03.2026

Kawel Rani, Age 72 Years

W/O Sh. Vijay Kumar Anand,

R/O Extension-D, Near Heritage

School, Sainik Colony, Jammu

…. Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)

Through:- Mr.Rohit Kohli, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Raghav Gaind, Advocate

V/s

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Jammu Municipal Corporation, through Its Commissioner, Town Hall, Jammu.

2. Joint Commissioner (Adm), Jammu Municipal Corporation, Town Hall, Jammu,

3. Chief Khilafwarzi Officer, Jammu Municipal Corporation, Town Hall, Jammu

…..Respondent(s)

Through:- Ms. Pallavi Sharma, Assisting Counsel to Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG for R-1 to 3

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M A CHOWDHARY, JUDGE

ORDER (ORAL)

1. Petitioner through the medium of this petition is claiming to be owner of the land measuring 01 Kanal 06 Marlas comprising of Khasra No. 786 situated at Village Deeli out of which, land measuring 12 Marlas and the land measuring 14 Marlas, land was purchased on the strength of two separate Sale Deeds and that she has raised construction on some portion of the land in the year 2012-13 and thereafter, the petitioner raised construction of the first floor in the year 2018, for running the business requirement of her family and a tin shed, over iron angles was raised

WP (C) No. 532/2026

temporarily in the year 2019 and that the respondents intend to demolish the construction raised by the petitioner, without following due course of law.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would feel satisfied in case this writ petition is disposed of, at this stage, with a direction to the respondents not to demolish the structure with building and shed of the petitioner, raised over her proprietary land comprising of Khasra No. 786 at village Deeli.

3. Since no notice is stated to have been issued, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents, to proceed in accordance with law, on finding contravention of any municipal law/rules/ regulations governing the subject.

(M A CHOWDHARY) JUDGE JAMMU

02.03.2026

Asif Tantray

Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead