Jammu and Kashmir High Court

MA/2/2018 of IMTIAZ AHMED Vs U.O.I.TH.DEFENCE SECY.AND ORS. on 19 February 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU MA No. 2/2018 Imtiaz Ahmed …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Rajneesh Raina, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Abid Khan, Advocate vs Union of India & Ors. .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Harshwardan Gupta, CGSC CORAM: HON’BLE MR.

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT JAMMU

MA No. 2/2018

Imtiaz Ahmed

…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)

Through: Mr. Rajneesh Raina, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Abid Khan, Advocate

vs

Union of India & Ors.

.…. Respondent(s)

Through: Mr. Harshwardan Gupta, CGSC

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M A CHOWDHARY, JUDGE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

(19.02.2026)

1. The above titled Appeal has been filed by the appellant against the order dated 15.12.2014 passed by learned Assistant Labour Commissioner, Jammu as Commissioner under Workmen Compensation Act (Now called as Employees Compensation Act) in file No. 02-MISC/EC Act/2010 titled Union of India & Anr. V/s Imtiaz Ahmed whereby the award passed in file No. Inj/33/WC Act/10 Dated 11.02.2013 was set aside and the claim of the petitioner was also dismissed.

2. After arguing for a considerable period, learned counsel for the appellant submits that having regard to the submissions of the learned counsel for the respondents that there existed no employer–employee or workman relationship between the appellant and the respondents, and also in view of the finding returned by the forum below on this issue, appellant be permitted to seek withdrawal of this Appeal, with liberty to file fresh claim in appropriate proceedings. His statement is taken on record. Serial No. 64

2

3. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the appellant, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the appellant to avail the available legal remedy. The period during which the appellant pursued the matter before the earlier forums and this Court shall not be an impediment on the ground of delay and laches.

4. The Appeal is thus dismissed as withdrawn, along with pending application(s).

5. Interim direction, if any, shall revoked.

(M A CHOWDHARY) JUDGE

Jammu 19.02.2026 Amit

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead