Jammu and Kashmir High Court

CCP(S)/428/2024 of GAURI SHANKER Vs SALONI RAI AND ANOTHER on 9 February 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CCP(S) No. 428/2024 in WP(C) No. 2167/2024 Gauri Shanker, S/O Late Sh. Pothi R/O Village Sui Tehsil and District Udhampur …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: None vs 1. Ms. Saloni Rai, Deputy Commissioner, Udhampur. 2. Sh. Jai Singh,

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT JAMMU

CCP(S) No. 428/2024 in

WP(C) No. 2167/2024

Gauri Shanker,

S/O Late Sh. Pothi

R/O Village Sui

Tehsil and District Udhampur

…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)

Through: None

vs

1. Ms. Saloni Rai,

Deputy Commissioner, Udhampur.

2. Sh. Jai Singh,

Tehsildar, Udhampur.

.…. Respondent(s)

Through: Ms. Nazia Fazal, AC vice

Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M A CHOWDHARY, JUDGE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

(09.02.2026)

1. The instant contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents for their willful defiance of the interim order dated 18.09.2024 passed by this Court in WP(C) No. 2167/2024, titled “Gauri Shanker vs. UT of J&K & Ors.”, whereby the following direction was issued: “Meanwhile, before proceeding further with the indent and passing any orders, the respondents are directed to provide the petitioner with an opportunity of being heard.”

2. The respondents have filed statement of facts, wherein it is pleaded that, in compliance with the aforesaid order, the Assistant Commissioner (Revenue), Udhampur, functioning as Assistant Collector, issued summons to the petitioner, directing him to appear before his Court either in person or through a pleader to Serial No. 25

2 CCP(S) No. 428/2024

put forth his claims with respect to the State land identified under Old Khasra No. 36 min (old) corresponding to New Khasra No. 58 (min), for land encompassing an area of 10 Kanals and 8 Marlas, situated at Village Sui, Tehsil and District Udhampur, which has been proposed for establishment of wet process facility at Village Sui.

3. Along with the statement of facts, an order dated 16.01.2025 passed by the Assistant Commissioner (Revenue), Udhampur, has also been placed on record. A perusal of the said order reveals that the petitioner has been duly heard in the matter, therefore, there does not appear to be any contravention of the contempt of interim order dated 18.09.2024 passed by this Court in WP(C) No. 2167/2024.

4. In view of the compliance having been made, no further proceedings in the contempt petition are called for.

5. Accordingly, the instant contempt petition is disposed of, and the contempt proceedings are dropped. (M A CHOWDHARY) JUDGE

Jammu 09.02.2026 Bir*

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead