Jammu and Kashmir High Court
CRM(M)/36/2024 of TAWSEEF MOHAMMAD PAHLOO Vs UNION TERRITORY THROUGH POLICE STATION SADAR AND ANR. (HOME DEPARTMENT) on 5 October 2026
OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CRM(M) 36/2024 CrlM(61/2024). Tawseef Mohammad Pahloo. …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. A . Hanan, Advocate. VERSUS U T of J & K & Anr. Through: None. …Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE YASH PAUL BOURNEY, JUDGE. ORDER
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
CRM(M) 36/2024 CrlM(61/2024).
Tawseef Mohammad Pahloo.
…Petitioner(s)
Through:
Mr. A. Hanan, Advocate.
VERSUS
U T of J & K & Anr.
Through:
None.
…Respondent(s)
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE YASH PAUL BOURNEY, JUDGE.
ORDER
05.10.2026
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press the present petition, particularly in view of the fact that some of the witnesses have already been examined before the learned Trial Court. Accordingly, on the statement of learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(YASH PAUL BOURNEY)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 05.10.2026 Bisma Jan.
S. No. 61 Regular
Page 1 of 1
Loading citations and judicial treatment…