Jammu and Kashmir High Court
CCP(S)/62/2022 of MOHAMMAD YOUSUF KUMAR Vs FAROOQ AHMAD QAZI AND ANR. on 29 September 2026
OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CCP(S) No. 62/2022 in SWP No. 646/2001 Mohammad Yousuf Kumar …..Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through: Mr. Mohammad Sameen, Advocate. q vs Farooq Ahmad Qazi and Anr. .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Zahid Qais Noor, GA. Coram:
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
CCP(S) No. 62/2022 in
SWP No. 646/2001
Mohammad Yousuf Kumar
…..Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through: Mr. Mohammad Sameen, Advocate.
q
vs
Farooq Ahmad Qazi and Anr.
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Zahid Qais Noor, GA.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
29.09.2026
01. Mr. Zahid, learned GA has produced order No. KVIB/132 of 2026 dated 25.09.2026, a perusal whereof reveals that case of the petitioner, who is a Contingent Paid Employee, was examined in the department and found devoid of merit because it is neither covered under the current policy of the Government in vogue regarding regularization of casual other workers notified vide SRO 520 dated 21.12.2017 nor the policy is applicable to KVIB. Order is taken on record.
02. In view of above, present petition does not survives.Contempt is closed.
03. Disposed of, with liberty to the petitioner to assail the consideration order, if he so desires.
(Rajesh Sekhri)
Judge
Srinagar 29.09.2026/Sushant
Sr. No.22