Jammu and Kashmir High Court
CCP(S)/336/2026 of NISAR AHMAD MIR AND ANOTHER Vs SUSHIL KUMAR, CHIEF ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS on 29 September 2026
No.85 Supp. Cause List IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CCP(S) 336/2026 in[WP(C) 1668/2026] NISAR AHMAD MIR AND ANOTHER …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s). Through: Mr. Sajad Ahmad Dar, Advocate Vs. SUSHIL KUMAR, CHIEF ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS
Serial No.85
Supp. Cause List
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
CCP(S) 336/2026 in[WP(C) 1668/2026]
NISAR AHMAD MIR AND ANOTHER
…Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s).
Through:
Mr. Sajad Ahmad Dar, Advocate
Vs.
SUSHIL KUMAR, CHIEF
ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS
...Respondent(s).
Through:
Mr. Bikramdeep Singh, Dy. AG
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER
29.09.2026
1. The instant petition arises out of the interim order dated 17.07.2026 passed in WP(C) No. 1668/2026, whereby the respondents were directed to consider the claim of the petitioners on or before the next date of hearing by passing a speaking order, provided there was no legal impediment.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.
3. Issue notice, which is waived by Mr. Bikramdeep Singh, learned Dy. AG, on behalf of the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioners shall provide a copy of the contempt petition to learned Dy. AG during the course of the day against proper receipt.
4. Mr. Bikramdeep Singh, learned Dy. AG, submits that the present petition has been filed seeking implementation of the interim order dated 17.07.2026 and assures the Court that the claim/representation of the petitioners shall be considered within a period of two weeks positively.
5. In view of the assurance given by learned Dy. AG, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the present petition pending. Accordingly, the same is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the claim/representation of the petitioners within a period of two weeks
Page 1 of 2
positively, by passing a speaking order, as directed by the interim order dated 17.07.2026, provided there is no other legal impediment.
6. In case the order dated 17.07.2026 is not complied with by the respondents within the aforesaid period, this Court shall be constrained to initiate appropriate coercive measures against the respondents and the petitioners in that eventuality shall be at liberty to seek revival the instant contempt petition.
7. Disposed of.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE SRINAGAR 29.09.2026 “Mubashir ”
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…