Jammu and Kashmir High Court
CRM(M)/339/2023 of JAMEER SINGH Vs MOHAMMAD SHAREEF on 28 September 2026
32 Regular HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CRM(M) No. 339/2023 CrlM No. (823/2023) Jameer Singh …Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through: None Vs. Mohammad Shareef ...Respondent(s) Through: None CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE ORDER 28.09.2026 1.
S. No. 32
Regular
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
CRM(M) No. 339/2023
CrlM No. (823/2023)
Jameer Singh
…Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through:
None
Vs.
Mohammad Shareef
...Respondent(s)
Through:
None
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
28.09.2026
1. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Earlier also there was no appearance.
2. In terms of an order dated 28.01.2026, the counsel for the petitioner was permitted to argue the case virtually or lay motion in this regard, however, there is no appearance.
3. Today, neither the petitioner nor his counsel are present. Also no leave has been sought to appear virtually.
4. It appears that petitioner has lost interest to pursue the matter further. Hence, dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(SANJAY PARIHAR)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 28.09.2026 Akhil Dev