Jammu and Kashmir High Court

CM(M)/119/2022 of IMTIYAZ BASHIR Vs NASRULLAH KHAN AND ANR. on 28 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

1 | P a g e Serial No. 23 Regular Cause list HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CM(M) 119/2022 Date of Pronouncement:28.09.2026 Uploaded on : 28.09.2026 IMTIYAZ BASHIR …Appellant(s)/Petitioners(s) Through: Mr. Sheikh Hilal, Advocate Vs. NASRULLAH KHAN AND ANR.

1 | P a g e

Serial No. 23

Regular Cause list

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT SRINAGAR

CM(M) 119/2022

Date of Pronouncement:28.09.2026

Uploaded on : 28.09.2026

IMTIYAZ BASHIR

…Appellant(s)/Petitioners(s)

Through:

Mr. Sheikh Hilal, Advocate

Vs.

NASRULLAH KHAN AND ANR.

...Respondent(s)

Through: Mr. Ishfaq Muzamil, Advocate

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

JUDGMENT

28.09.2026 (ORAL)

1. Petitioner has invoked supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for quashment of orders dated 14.07.2022 and 18.07.2022 qua the subject matter, with a further mandamus to learned Principal District Judge, Srinagar to transfer the matter to any other court of competent jurisdiction.

2. Perusal of the file reveals that learned court of 3rd Additional Munsiff, Srinagar [„the trial court‟] in terms of order dated 28.05.2022 vacated the interim order passed on 04.04.2022, in a civil suit titled “Imtiyaz Bashir Vs. Nasrullah Khan & Anr.”. An appeal preferred by the petitioner against the said vacation of order, came to be dismissed by learned 3rd Additional Judge, Srinagar [„the appellate court‟] vide order dated 09.06.2023.

3. After the dismissal of the appeal, respondent No. 1, defendant No. 1 in the suit, invoked Section 94, read with Section 151 CPC and approached the trial court for restoration of possession of the property to him. The trial

2 | P a g e

court vide order dated 14.07.2022 directed SHO concerned to implement the order dated 28.05.2022 in letter and spirit, by handing over the possession of the suit property to the applicant, respondent No. 1 herein.

4. It appears that the concerned SHO approached the trial court with an application that he was facing hurdles on the ground, in implementation of the aforesaid order, as such, learned trial court vide order dated 18.07.2022 directed the concerned Tehsildar to remain present on the spot with the SHO for implementation of order dated 28.05.2025.

5. Both the orders dated 14.07.2022 & 18.07.2022 have been called into question in the present writ petition by the petitioner.

6. Perusal of the reply filed by respondent No. 1, reveals that both the aforesaid orders, including order dated 28.05.2023, whereby interim injunction came to be vacated, as also the orders impugned in the present petition dated 14.07.2022 and 18.07.2022, whereby concerned authorities were directed to implement the said order in letter and spirit by handing over possession of the subject property to respondent No. 1, stand implemented on the spot.

7. Learned counsel for respondent No. 1 has also informed this court that meanwhile, the suit preferred by the petitioner also came to be dismissed for non-prosecution by the trial court on 22.05.2024 and now nothing survives in the present controversy.

8. In view of the above, since both the orders, impugned in the present petition, stand implemented and the suit, which gave rise to both the orders already stands dismissed for non-prosecution, nothing survives in

3 | P a g e

the present petition. Hence, present petition is dismissed, along with connected CMs.

9. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.

(RAJESH SEKHRI)

JUDGE

Srinagar: 28.09.2026 Adil Ismail  Whether the Judgment is Reportable?

Yes/No  Whether the Judgment is Speaking?

Yes/No

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead