Jammu and Kashmir High Court
CCP(S)/335/2021 of AHMADULLAH Vs TASADUQ HUSSAIN MIR (SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT) (SWP/1299/2008) on 26 September 2026
No. 2 Regular Cause list IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CCP(S) 335/2021 in [SWP 1299/2008] AHMADULLAH(SENIOR CITIZEN) ….. Appellant/petitioner(s) Through: - Mr. Iman Abdul Muizz, Advocate V/s TASADUQ HUSSAIN MIR (SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT) …..
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Serial No. 2 Regular Cause list IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CCP(S) 335/2021 in
[SWP 1299/2008]
AHMADULLAH(SENIOR CITIZEN)
….. Appellant/petitioner(s) Through: - Mr. Iman Abdul Muizz, Advocate
V/s
TASADUQ HUSSAIN MIR (SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT)
….. Respondent(s) Through: - Mr. Shahbaz Sikander, AAG
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE
(ORDER) 26.09.2026
01. This Court in terms of order dated 23.02.2012, in SWP No. 1299/2008, directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for regularizing his services on the post of Head Assistant with further direction to pay the petitioner all service/retiral benefits by declaring him to be a regular Head Assistant.
02. Compliance report stands filed, a perusal whereof reveals that in compliance to the aforesaid Judgment, respondents have already issued order No. 232-DSEK of 2023 dated 20.09.2023, whereby the petitioner was retrospectively regularized/confirmed as Head Mohammad Yaseen Dar I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Assistant from the date he had been functioning as In-charge Head Assistant. Thereafter his case for consequential monetary benefits was processed and persuaded with the concerned field authorities. The Chief Education Officer, Budgam, thereafter certified that petitioner has been granted retrospective confirmation as Head Assistant w.e.f. 24.04.2003; that salary arrears amounting to Rs. 3,966/- have been released in his favour; that revised cash in lieu of leave salary amounting to Rs. 6,933/- has also been released; that the requisite entries have been duly incorporated in his service record and the revised pensionary benefits have been processed in accordance with applicable rules.
03. Learned counsel for petitioner has submitted that though the respondents are stated to have revised the pensionary benefits of petitioner, same till date have not been released by them.
04. Learned counsel for respondents has made a statement at Bar, that since the revised pensionary benefits of petitioner stands processed in accordance with applicable rules, same will be released in due course.
05. In view of the above, since the Judgment passed by the writ Court stands complied with, the present petition does not survive, same is closed. However, if the retiral benefits of the petitioner are not released by the respondents within four weeks, he shall be entitled to seek restoration of the present petition.
06. Disposed of.
(RAJESH SEKHRI)
JUDGE SRINAGAR 26.09.2026 “Mohammad Yasin Dar” Mohammad Yaseen Dar I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document