Jammu and Kashmir High Court
WP(C)/1002/2021 of SAJAD HUSSAIN BHAT Vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (URBAN LOCAL BODIES DEPARTMENT) on 21 September 2026
No.36 Regular Cause List HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 1002/2021 CM(2361/2022) CM(3268/2021) SAJAD HUSSAIN BHAT …PETITIONER(S) Through: None V/s. UNION TERRITORY OF J&K AND ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) Through: Ms. Shaila Shameem, Assisting Counsel vice Mr.
Serial No.36
Regular Cause List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) 1002/2021
CM(2361/2022)
CM(3268/2021)
SAJAD HUSSAIN BHAT
…PETITIONER(S)
Through:
None
V/s.
UNION TERRITORY OF J&K AND ORS.
...RESPONDENT(S)
Through:
Ms. Shaila Shameem, Assisting Counsel vice Mr. Ilyas Nazir Laway, GA
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
21.09.2026
01. Learned counsel for the petitioner last appeared in this case on 30.06.2026 and, thereafter, either he is absent or is being represented by proxy counsel. It appears that the petitioner is not interested anymore in further prosecution of this petition.
02. Hence, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution, along with connected application(s).
03. Interim direction, if any, subsisting shall stand vacated.
(RAJESH SEKHRI)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 21.09.2026 “Mir Arif”
MIR ARIF MANZOOR I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 22.09.26