Jammu and Kashmir High Court
CCP(S)/88/2026 of MOHD MAQBOOL MALIK AND ORS Vs FAZLUL HASEEB, COMMISSIONER SRINAGAR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, SRINAGAR AND OTHERS on 21 September 2026
No. 20 Regular Cause list HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CCP(S) 88/2026 in [WP(C) 2976/2024] MOHD MAQBOOL MALIK AND ORS …Appellant(s)/Petitioners(s) Through: Mr. Saleem Gul, Advocate Vs. FAZLUL HASEEB, COMMISSIONER SRINAGAR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, SRINAGAR AND
Serial No. 20
Regular Cause list
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
CCP(S) 88/2026 in
[WP(C) 2976/2024]
MOHD MAQBOOL MALIK AND ORS
…Appellant(s)/Petitioners(s)
Through:
Mr. Saleem Gul, Advocate
Vs.
FAZLUL HASEEB, COMMISSIONER
SRINAGAR
MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION,
SRINAGAR
AND
OTHERS
...Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Bikramdeep Singh, Dy.AG
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
21.09.2026
1. Vide order dated 20.12.2024, this Court in WP(C) 2976/2024 titled “Mohd. Maqbool Malik & Ors. Vs. Union Territory of J&K & Ors.”, directed the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioners for grant of retrospective effect to their promotion as Section Officers and pass appropriate orders.
2. Compliance report stands filed, a perusal whereof reveals that after examination of the record and relevant rules, the committee has approved the proposal for antedating the promotional effect and recommended for retrospective effect to the promotion of the petitioners. The consequential benefits, including fixation of pay, pensionary benefits and arrears have also been regulated in accordance with the applicable rules by the competent authority.
3. Having regard to the compliance, since the aforesaid order stands complied with, present petition does not survive and consequently, contempt proceedings are closed.
(RAJESH SEKHRI)
JUDGE
Srinagar: 21.09.2026 Adil Ismail