Jammu and Kashmir High Court

CM(M)/162/2023 of ALTAF HUSSAIN MAJOR Vs MEHRAJ UDDIN KANROO on 21 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

33 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CM(M) 162/2023 CM(4397/2023) CM(5418/2025) ALTAF HUSSAIN MAJOR …Petitioner(s) Through: Ms. Gousun Nisa, Advocate vice Mr. M. Y. Bhat, Sr. Advocate. Vs. MEHRAJ UDDIN KANROO ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. N. H. Shah, Sr.

S. No. 33

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH

AT SRINAGAR

CM(M) 162/2023 CM(4397/2023) CM(5418/2025)

ALTAF HUSSAIN MAJOR

…Petitioner(s)

Through: Ms. Gousun Nisa, Advocate vice

Mr. M. Y. Bhat, Sr. Advocate.

Vs.

MEHRAJ UDDIN KANROO

...Respondent(s)

Through: Mr. N. H. Shah, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Saima Ghulam, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

21.09.2026 CM No.5418/2025

1. This is an application filed by the applicant/petitioner, for directing the Principal District Judge Baramulla, to proceed with the trial and decide the Review Petition filed by him against the order dated 28.07.2023 by virtue of which the suit preferred by the non- applicant/respondent was decreed.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner submits that present petition be disposed of by allowing the present application and appropriate directions be issued to the learned Trial Court to decide the Review Petition preferred by the applicant/petitioner.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents has expressed no objection to the submissions made by Ms. Gousun Nisa, Advocate appearing counsel for the applicant/petitioner.

4. In view of the aforesaid submissions, the present application as well as main petition is disposed of by directing the learned Principal District Judge, Baramulla, to decide the Review Petition preferred by the applicant/petitioner as expeditiously as possible, on its own merits.

5. Disposed of.

(RAJNESH OSWAL)

JUDGE SRINAGAR 21.09.2026 Ishaq

Isaq Hameed Bhat I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 22.09.26

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead