Jammu and Kashmir High Court
WP(C)/2347/2026 of SHAHINA AKHTER AND ANOTHER Vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (HOME) AND OTHERS on 19 September 2026
No.27 Supplementary Cause List-I HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 2347/2026 CM(6386/2026) SHAHINA AKHTER AND ANOTHER …PETITIONER(S) Through: Mr. Imteyaz Rashid Bhat, Advocate. V/s. UNION TERRITORY OF J&K AND ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) Through: CORAM:
Serial No.27
Supplementary Cause List-I
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) 2347/2026
CM(6386/2026)
SHAHINA AKHTER AND ANOTHER
…PETITIONER(S)
Through:
Mr. Imteyaz Rashid Bhat, Advocate.
V/s.
UNION TERRITORY OF J&K AND ORS.
...RESPONDENT(S)
Through:
CORAM:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal, Judge.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
19.09.2026
01. The petitioners seek a direction to the official respondents to provide them the police protection as they apprehend danger to their lives from the private respondents. It is submitted that the petitioners are major and out of their free will, have contracted marriage. Copy of Nikahnama has been placed on record. The petitioners submit that since their marriage was solemnized against the wishes of the private respondents, as such, they are being harassed by them.
02. Learned counsel for the petitioners refers to the decision of the Supreme Court in “Lata Singh v. State of U.P. and Anr”, “(2006) 5 SCC 475”, and submits that in absence of there being any legal impediment, the petitioners are entitled to marry according to their choice and the official respondents are duty bound to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners.
03. It is settled law that any person having attained the age of majority is entitled to contract the marriage as per his/her wishes and the police authorities are duty bound to ensure protection to his/her life and liberty, if approached. However, it appears that the petitioners have not yet approached the official respondents for providing them such protection.
04. In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of at this stage by providing that the official respondents shall look into the grievance of the petitioners for providing them adequate security and ensure that nobody interferes in their married life, if they approach them. It is made clear that no opinion has been expressed with regard to the validity of their marriage.
05. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of along with connected application(s) in the manner indicated above.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 19.09.2026
“Hamid”
Abdul Hamid Bhat I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document