Jammu and Kashmir High Court
WP(C)/1456/2025 of ARIF AHMAD KHAN Vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE) AND ORS on 19 September 2026
Regular list HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C)/1456/2025 CM/3752/2025 c\w CCP(S)/354/2025 Arif Ahmad Khan (Age 46 years) S/O Aejaz Ahmad Khan R/O H. No. 6, Sector JK, Budshah Nagar Natipora, Srinagar, Kashmir. Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Bilal Ahmad
S. No.25
Regular list
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR
WP(C)/1456/2025
CM/3752/2025
c\w
CCP(S)/354/2025
Arif Ahmad Khan (Age 46 years)
S/O Aejaz Ahmad Khan
R/O H. No. 6, Sector JK, Budshah Nagar
Natipora, Srinagar, Kashmir.
Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Bilal Ahmad Malla, Advocate.
Vs.
1. UT
of
J&K
through
Commissioner/Secretary
Industries and Commerce Department,
Civil Secretariat Srinagar/Jammu.
2. Chairman Governing Body, J & K
Entrepreneurship Development Institute (JKEDI)
Sempora, Pampore, District Pulwama.
3. Director, Jammu & Kashmir Entrepreneurship Development Institute (JKEDI) Sempora, Pampore, District Pulwama.
...Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Shaila, Advocate vice
Mr. Waseem Gul, GA.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MA CHOWDHARY, JUDGE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
19.09.2026
WP(C)/1456/2025
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned order No. JKEDI/HR-228 of 2024 dated 08.11.2024, is stated to have been revoked, as such, this petition has been rendered infructuous. He, however, submits that the respondents be directed to take a decision with regard to the period of suspension of the petitioner.
2. The petition is thus, disposed of along with interim application(s) in view of the reinstatement of the petitioner and revocation of the impugned suspension order, the same having been rendered infructuous.
3. The respondents are, however, expected to decide the matter with regard to treating suspension period, in accordance with the Rules on the subject, expeditiously.
4. Disposed of accordingly, along with connected application(s). CCP(S)/354/2025
5. In view of the disposal of the main petition, the contempt petition is also closed, requiring no further proceedings.
;
(MA CHOWDHARY)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 19.09.2026 “Hilal”